Scam report against | 1718737-Bluehater & more l ?

[Alexej27]

1F2z7k3tSFAYha95s4piPZG8yuwLkJBjsz

 

^ here 

 

also decide who pays me or split it under you guys member or the profit from the plane ranks 

[itsluci]

I don't quite understand why we would pay for his content, while "his" content is ripped 1:1 or even made shorter from other ebooks.

Take a look at this public leak for example. Even the file is named Alexej:

 

https://cracked(.)to/Thread-100-Nulled-E-Books-Leaked - something is deleting the link

Download: https://anonfile.com...8cn9/Alexej_rar

 

Here's the first version of Alexej's book: https://mega.nz/#!e3...y5pxoBILoEmXoKQ

 

Let's take a look on "his" first method - "Get games over eBay".

Compare it to the file from the leak: (Steam_Keys.pdf) https://mega.nz/#!L2hhGQxK!fWaxCOjOw4hFt3SuE6rLwoeWOH3JkEniF4CLckh4yO4 and how he copied TWO methods in one point 1:1 while only changing words. This can't be a coincidence that two methods are the same one after one.

 

Let's proceed to his second method: "Exploiting Steam"
Open the (Cheap_Steam_Games.pdf) https://mega.nz/#!imhjnIRA!TlgTdPA1BmVabvt32wSeXmnKH18WDzFevPACqR62dHA from the leak.
Both ebooks are divided in 3 parts (just like the OG ebook) as headers:

 

Section 1 : Introduction / Exploiting Steam Part 1

Section 2 : Setting up Steam / Changing Shopregion Part 2

Section 3 : Setting up PayPal / How to Pay Part 3

 

Where everything is explained in the same way - even the leaked ebook is more informative.

 

Lastly, his third method from his ebook: Steam Random Keys
For reference, open the leaked file (Steamkiller_ebook.pdf) https://mega.nz/#!jiwnmSwJ!wcbBwqlmMkOFFvd1FXnyh-zVUO5yBxuqAmbWy2kosyA . The supplier website is the same and the file construction is very similar.

 

All things considered, I don't believe Alexej is entitled to a compensation, because his ebook is a compilation of already leaked ebooks. In my opinion those who should be compensated (by Alexej) are the original creators.

[Alexej27]

I don't quite understand why we would pay for his content, while "his" content is ripped 1:1 or even made shorter from other ebooks.

Take a look at this public leak for example. Even the file is named Alexej:

 

https://cracked(.)to/Thread-100-Nulled-E-Books-Leaked - something is deleting the link

Download: https://anonfile.com...8cn9/Alexej_rar

 

Here's the first version of Alexej's book: https://mega.nz/#!e3...y5pxoBILoEmXoKQ

 

Let's take a look on "his" first method - "Get games over eBay".

Compare it to the file from the leak: (Steam_Keys.pdf) https://mega.nz/#!L2hhGQxK!fWaxCOjOw4hFt3SuE6rLwoeWOH3JkEniF4CLckh4yO4 and how he copied TWO methods in one point 1:1 while only changing words. This can't be a coincidence that two methods are the same one after one.

 

Let's proceed to his second method: "Exploiting Steam"
Open the (Cheap_Steam_Games.pdf) https://mega.nz/#!imhjnIRA!TlgTdPA1BmVabvt32wSeXmnKH18WDzFevPACqR62dHA from the leak.
Both ebooks are divided in 3 parts (just like the OG ebook) as headers:

 

Section 1 : Introduction / Exploiting Steam Part 1

Section 2 : Setting up Steam / Changing Shopregion Part 2

Section 3 : Setting up PayPal / How to Pay Part 3

 

Where everything is explained in the same way - even the leaked ebook is more informative.

 

Lastly, his third method from his ebook: Steam Random Keys
For reference, open the leaked file (Steamkiller_ebook.pdf) https://mega.nz/#!jiwnmSwJ!wcbBwqlmMkOFFvd1FXnyh-zVUO5yBxuqAmbWy2kosyA . The supplier website is the same and the file construction is very similar.

 

All things considered, I don't believe Alexej is entitled to a compensation, because his ebook is a compilation of already leaked ebooks. In my opinion those who should be compensated (by Alexej) are the original creators.

 

i already saw the cto thread its multiple ebooks 

and none of these ebooks are mine i neither dont know why the file name is Alexej 

1-6 are your ebooks if i remember right as you sold them but had multiple scam reports (about beeing public) and closed it which i also did (closing this ebook project as i got no sales) :thinkw:

 

the quality wasnt the best at the start or the methods but i worked on it provided updates and support for people 

 

 

why post my ebook in your group though 

i created a ebook and sold it and you grabbed it and shared it to over 10 people as it only shows the online people and yesterday there were 8 online plane people = means its without the offline ones 

[itsluci]

i already saw the cto thread its multiple ebooks 
and none of these ebooks are mine i neither dont know why the file name is Alexej 
1-6 are your ebooks if i remember right as you sold them but had multiple scam reports (about beeing public) and closed it which i also did (closing this ebook project as i got no sales) :thinkw:
 
the quality wasnt the best or the methods but i worked on it provided updates and support for people 
 
 
why post my ebook in your group though 
i created a ebook and sold it and you grabbed it and shared it to over 10 people as it only shows the online people and yesterday there were 8 online plane people = means its without the offline ones

 

"i already saw the cto thread its multiple ebooks
and none of these ebooks are mine i neither dont know why the file name is Alexej"

 

I know these ebooks aren't yours, but it looks very suspicious, like you copied these ebooks while changing words.

Maybe someone wanted to prove something when he named the file this way? Coincidence?

 

"1-6 are your ebooks if i remember right as you sold them but had multiple scam reports (about beeing public) and closed it which i also did (closing this ebook project as i got no sales) :thinkw:"

 

I was proxyselling for my offsite partner not related to our group. If you look at our Discord chat, you'll see that I told you about it. We also refunded people who didn't like it and closed the thread. Anyway, this is not relevant to this report.

 

"the quality wasnt the best or the methods but i worked on it provided updates and support for people"

 

Still, you can't just sell public methods and make up for it by offering support. My partner did the same and we still had to stop sales - just like you should if you were getting sales. Even though we provided support.

 

"why post my ebook in your group though [...] and shared it"

 

Wasn't me. I only shared my folder of public methods I had with the admins which I have admitted to. Your ebook was put there because it didn't have much value and was insanely public. My main role on the server is to MM deals.

 

"i created a ebook"

 

Copied*

 

[Lucas]

"i already saw the cto thread its multiple ebooks
and none of these ebooks are mine i neither dont know why the file name is Alexej"
 
I know these ebooks aren't yours, but it looks very suspicious, like you copied these ebooks while changing words.
Maybe someone wanted to prove something when he named the file this way? Coincidence?
 
"1-6 are your ebooks if i remember right as you sold them but had multiple scam reports (about beeing public) and closed it which i also did (closing this ebook project as i got no sales) :thinkw:"
 
I was proxyselling for my offsite partner not related to our group. If you look at our Discord chat, you'll see that I told you about it. We also refunded people who didn't like it and closed the thread. Anyway, this is not relevant to this report.
 
"the quality wasnt the best or the methods but i worked on it provided updates and support for people"
 
Still, you can't just sell public methods and make up for it by offering support. My partner did the same and we still had to stop sales - just like you should if you were getting sales. Even though we provided support.
 
"why post my ebook in your group though [...] and shared it"
 
Wasn't me. I only shared my folder of public methods I had with the admins which I have admitted to. Your ebook was put there because it didn't have much value and was insanely public. My main role on the server is to MM deals.
 
"i created a ebook"
 
Copied*

I have no problem with banning all involved members due to the posting of products owned by nulled members, you shouldn’t be asking for vouches and then leaking the copies you get, under any circumstances, what you do with the copy you get is your responsibility, if you decided to leak it you will get punished for it, if the guide was terrible, public, as bad as you claim, then why did you specifically leak that to the higher ranks on your server? It makes absolutely no sense, if you did that on purpose then you are delusional, if the higher ranks get crap I wonder what the lower get.
If you thought his ebook was bad, you should have reported it here. Not kept it for yourself and leaked it to your “money making group”. You are being incoherent in your arguments.

[Alexej27]

 

I was proxyselling for my offsite partner not related to our group. If you look at our Discord chat, you'll see that I told you about it. We also refunded people who didn't like it and closed the thread. Anyway, this is not relevant to this report.

the ebook quality isnt neither important you took my product and gave it a group and even "selling" as only people get it who have a paid subscription 

[itsluci]

I still don't see where the 90$ is coming from, as the ebook has no original input from him but is a compilation of other public available ebooks which I proved in the previous post. I also mentioned that the ebook is public in my vouch review.

If someone opened a SR on him while he still was selling, he would have to stop sales because it's public and worth 0$.

[Alexej27]

I still don't see where the 90$ is coming from, as the ebook has no original input from him but is a compilation of other public available ebooks which I proved in the previous post. I also mentioned that the ebook is public in my vouch review.

If someone opened a SR on him while he still was selling, he would have to stop sales because it's public and worth 0$.

there wasnt a scam report on me regarding that so you cant say that

i could also say if x happened y would happen 100% 

 

it could be more if you say the product is 70-90 (first price) 

you gave it to more than 10 people = 700$

if its the last price which is 30 its 300$

 

 

i take 10 as a number but there are for sure more 

yesterday 8 were online right now 4 i dont know how many offline people there are 

 

-

again you took my product posted it into the group and selled it 

if you complain about the quality or the public content you should have done it earlier 

 

why post it in your group if you complain its lq/public/bad 

[JEBANYGNOM]

there wasnt a scam report on me regarding that so you cant say that

i could also say if x happened y would happen 100% 

 

it could be more if you say the product is 70-90 (first price) 

you gave it to more than 10 people = 700$

if its the last price which is 30 its 300$

 

 

i take 10 as a number but there are for sure more 

yesterday 8 were online right now 4 i dont know how many offline people there are 

 

-

again you took my product posted it into the group and selled it 

if you complain about the quality or the public content you should have done it earlier 

 

why post it in your group if you complain its lq/public/bad 

 

zamknij pizde

[Lucas]

I still don't see where the 90$ is coming from, as the ebook has no original input from him but is a compilation of other public available ebooks which I proved in the previous post. I also mentioned that the ebook is public in my vouch review.
If someone opened a SR on him while he still was selling, he would have to stop sales because it's public and worth 0$.

Imagine you have a clothing store, you make shirts and jeans, I call your products low quality and shit and I counterfeit them and resell them to your potential customers, you think that’s not lawsuit worthy? You took something you got for free, the quality of the product is irrelevant, you had no reason to leak his guide on your server no matter how many members were able to see it, you didn’t ask him prior to posting it if he would be okay with it, you just went ahead and leaked it without the original owners approval.