Questions about relationship seller to buyer

[DaisakuIkeda]

It has absolutely nothing to do with the scam report, I'm not complaining about that and I appreciate the work of the admins and moderators.

I'm just curious to hear your opinions about it.

 

 

Today I opened a scam report, the seller refunded me the price for the method, but this method reportedly neededed an investment of around EUR 30-40, so I trusted him, the seller assured  me I would not have incurred any risk loss, at least for the first investment. I lost the first time, but since I thought it was my fault, I tried again, this time with a greater speed in doing things, but it didn't help at all, so that I lost everything. Afterwards, I also discovered that the seller was selling a  completely public and month old method. I opened a scam report, but it was closed, since according to "Nulled" if the seller refunds me the money paid for the method and closes the sales page then he cannot receive any penalty. The problem is that I had not only paid for an ebook, I lost about EUR 70 to follow a method that does not work (there is no risk, it guarantees you the loss).

I wanted to tell this little story because I would be curious to hear your opinion about it.

 

Has it ever happened to you? Do you think the seller should also have refund the money spent using his method? A Seller that ensures success, but then it turns out to be false, is it honest?

[3X1L3DP4TH]

Some time ago something similar happened to me with a Bitcoin betting method (something like Martingale system) in which the seller secured profit. Actually everything worked fine until I made a couple of greedy bets and lost some money. I fully understood that it was my fault, but I felt "cheated" (but the time has made me change my mind).

 

Regarding the refund of the money invested, it is somewhat complicated to verify, since with a couple of changes in the elements of a web page (something that an elementary school user could do) you can "modify" this amount invested, and that wouldn't be fair for the seller.

 

Anyway, even if the seller was honest and the method worked for him or he tried to scam people, is something that only he will know for sure.

 

Conclusion: Refund for the price of the method? If you have followed the steps and it does not work, yes. Refund of what was invested in the method? I would say no, unless there is obvious evidence of the amount invested (somewhat complicated in times of After Effects and Photoshop).

[DaisakuIkeda]

Some time ago something similar happened to me with a Bitcoin betting method (something like Martingale system) in which the seller secured profit. Actually everything worked fine until I made a couple of greedy bets and lost some money. I fully understood that it was my fault, but I felt "cheated" (but the time has made me change my mind).

 

Regarding the refund of the money invested, it is somewhat complicated to verify, since with a couple of changes in the elements of a web page (something that an elementary school user could do) you can "modify" this amount invested, and that wouldn't be fair for the seller.

 

Anyway, even if the seller was honest and the method worked for him or he tried to scam people, is something that only he will know for sure.

 

Conclusion: Refund for the price of the method? If you have followed the steps and it does not work, yes. Refund of what was invested in the method? I would say no, unless there is obvious evidence of the amount invested (somewhat complicated in times of After Effects and Photoshop).

I agree with your thinks. If the method is public buyer should receive the refund? If the buyer provide real proofs like a gif while refreshing page should receive a refund also for money spent on investment?

[DaisakuIkeda]

bb

[DaisakuIkeda]

bb

[Xflower2]

Thanks