ALERT!
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!

Jump to content



Photo

Q&A About Dorks | stop copy->pasting


  • Please log in to reply
Q&A About Dorks | stop copy->pasting

#61

multirecargas1
multirecargas1
    Offline
    0
    Rep
    0
    Likes

    Lurker

Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 09, 2018
Credits: 0
Five years registered
#61

no entiendo


  • 0

#62

Frogogogogog
Frogogogogog
    Offline
    0
    Rep
    0
    Likes

    ⛥Nudist Frog⛥

  • PipPipPip
Posts: 59
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 09, 2018
Credits: 0
Five years registered
#62

<333


  • 0

#63

rafael290794
rafael290794
    Offline
    -2
    Rep
    27
    Likes

    Veteran

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
Posts: 480
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Credits: 0

Seven years registered
#63

Hello Navigator, Im sorry if im late asking this but i have a question abouts dorks

 

Is there a problem with this dork right here? This is the one im usually using with a few modifications. I wanted to know if this dork is the right type of dork to use.

 

1. inurl:php?= site:.com intext:"fortnite skin"

 

 

 

Another thing i wanted to know

 

Is there a differente between these 3 dorks?

 

1. inurl:php?= site:.com intext:"fornite skin"

 

2. inurl:php?= site:.com intext:"fortnite" intext:"skin"

 

3. inurl:php?= site:.com intext:fornite skin

 

 

When i use the first, second and third dork i always get 5 results on Google.

 

However the results are always different websites! How do i know which one of this dorks is better? Should i use them all??

[member='Navigator']

Edited by rafael290794, 10 November 2018 - 06:00 AM.

  • 0

#64

Effervescence
Effervescence
    Offline
    234
    Rep
    801
    Likes

    Veteran

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
Posts: 1265
Threads: 245
Joined: Nov 27, 2017
Credits: 0

Deal with caution
User has an open scam report.
Six years registered
#64
[member='Navigator']

Well thanks for asking me .

Firstly i wanted to say that you have to use the member= outside of the code box or it does not work, so you are just lucky that i am seeing this question right now

 

Now to your questions, this type of dork you are creating is called google dork, using the inurl method, and i can say it is working

 

But you seem to be losing the point of dorks here. When you scan dorks to get URLs you try to find as many urls possible, so you have to use as many dorks as possible, 

so of course you will have to use all three of these dorks, 

and yes there is difference between each of these dorks, even a character change in a dork can give different results.

And as you can see in the thread, i say that you should create around 10K dorks. Not too many to crash the dumper and lose your time, and not to few to get few urls and less injectables.

if you wanted 3-4 sites you could just scan the for vulnerabilities as one of the other member said and use their vulnerabilities to dump directly without using dorks.

 

So the point of dorks is more quantity than quality


  • 1

#65

rafael290794
rafael290794
    Offline
    -2
    Rep
    27
    Likes

    Veteran

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
Posts: 480
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Credits: 0

Seven years registered
#65

Well thanks for asking me .

Firstly i wanted to say that you have to use the member= outside of the code box or it does not work, so you are just lucky that i am seeing this question right now

 

Now to your questions, this type of dork you are creating is called google dork, using the inurl method, and i can say it is working

 

But you seem to be losing the point of dorks here. When you scan dorks to get URLs you try to find as many urls possible, so you have to use as many dorks as possible, 

so of course you will have to use all three of these dorks, 

and yes there is difference between each of these dorks, even a character change in a dork can give different results.

And as you can see in the thread, i say that you should create around 10K dorks. Not too many to crash the dumper and lose your time, and not to few to get few urls and less injectables.

if you wanted 3-4 sites you could just scan the for vulnerabilities as one of the other member said and use their vulnerabilities to dump directly without using dorks.

 

So the point of dorks is more quantity than quality

 

Thank you for the fast answer!

 

3 days ago i did what u just said hahahaha i tried using 60k dorks and 20h later it was still in 15% and mysqli crashed hahaha

 

The problem, i think, is that when i use general dorks to get more urls i probably will not get private combos.

 

Im doing these for a 2 weeks and i dont get a lot of valid urls (around 1000-1200) however i always get around 60-100 injectables. (I dont think thats bad hahaha)

 

Thanks again. If i have another question can i still ask?

 

Navigator

 

i use it like this right?


  • 0

#66

Effervescence
Effervescence
    Offline
    234
    Rep
    801
    Likes

    Veteran

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
Posts: 1265
Threads: 245
Joined: Nov 27, 2017
Credits: 0

Deal with caution
User has an open scam report.
Six years registered
#66

Thank you for the fast answer!

 

3 days ago i did what u just said hahahaha i tried using 60k dorks and 20h later it was still in 15% and mysqli crashed hahaha

 

The problem, i think, is that when i use general dorks to get more urls i probably will not get private combos.

 

Im doing these for a 2 weeks and i dont get a lot of valid urls (around 1000-1200) however i always get around 60-100 injectables. (I dont think thats bad hahaha)

 

Thanks again. If i have another question can i still ask?

 

Navigator

 

i use it like this right?

yeah you used it right this time, i hope you dont forget to change your ip, cause the dumper will stop after a bit of scanning

 

Of course you are free to ask anything, to get more injectables and more private combos better not make google dorks, and make "targeted dorks"

unfortunately i have not made a guide on how to make these, but you can make a bit of research here in the forum or in other forums to learn how to structure them


  • 0

#67

itslolboy
itslolboy
    Offline
    0
    Rep
    0
    Likes

    Member

  • PipPipPip
Posts: 49
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 31, 2018
Credits: 0
Five years registered
#67

lol


  • 0

#68

hacker126
hacker126
    Offline
    0
    Rep
    1
    Likes

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPipPip
Posts: 107
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
Credits: 0
Six years registered
#68

Thanks


  • 0

#69

ozo619
ozo619
    Offline
    0
    Rep
    0
    Likes

    Member

  • PipPipPip
Posts: 49
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2018
Credits: 0
Five years registered
#69

Amazing Q&A


  • 0

#70

Alair
Alair
    Offline
    14
    Rep
    288
    Likes

    https://rare-pepe.com/

Posts: 280
Threads: 172
Joined: Jul 07, 2018
Credits: 0

Five years registered
#70

this will be a long thread 


  • 0


 Users browsing this thread: