Scam report against Teken 0.03087 BTC | UID = 45124 | %Amount%

[pRince0000]

I do understand your point, all im saying is, the address belongs to OP and does not look like a disposable one. So in the end he received the money

How can you prove that actually? Also, how come you're not willing to release the time difference between those 2 addresses being provided to Teken?

[1XXX1]

I do understand your point, all im saying is, the address belongs to OP and does not look like a disposable one. So in the end he received the money

IMO if this is a forum that respects itself and its rules this is honestly a non issue. All you need to do is set the standards for what the MM's job consists of. If it consists of confirming the addresses before he sends anything then it's Teken's onus to pay back the money. If you think that the onus should be on the client who requested the MM to always give only 1 address and not try to save himself some time then it's OP's fault. Either way I honestly don't understand why this is even a subject of discussion. GL solving it tho.

[Jokerart]

Don't think there's any way to prove it so should't we just act like it isn't his?

And thats why Teken is not unbanned, But seeing that the address has 1,000 other than the funds in this deal should show that it belongs to someone and is not a temporary address. 

[7Fingers]

I do understand your point, all im saying is, the address belongs to OP and does not look like a disposable one. So in the end he received the money

I think he may have received it and after a few days or a week he opens a scam report to get + 400 $ double the amount that was refunded by Teken and he should find you by Teken reputation he would repay ...

[JellyFish]

IMO if this is a forum that respects itself and its rules this is honestly a non issue. All you need to do is set the standards for what the MM's job consists of. If it consists of confirming the addresses before he sends anything then it's Teken's onus to pay back the money. If you think that the onus should be on the client who requested the MM to always give only 1 address and not try to save himself some time then it's OP's fault. Either way I honestly don't understand why this is even a subject of discussion. GL solving it tho.

One thing I think is pretty clear is that the MM is responsible for the entire deal and thus also for the refund. So if there went something wrong it's the fault of the MM.

[lnsane]

Teken is not a scammer.

 

He sent money to address that was given by OP.

 

Why does he have to check the address before send BTC?

 

 

If OP gave him wrong address, then it's OP's fault. not his fault.

 

 

 

If Teken got right address then send it to wrong address then he has to cover money.

 

Easy situation.

 

 

 

As I remember, Teken has never thought about the scam on this community. 

 

 

I understand OP's side but I don't understand how OP didn't write about that situation he wrongly gave 2 addresses to Teken on this thread.

 

OP just made Teken looks like a stupid boy here.

[1XXX1]

One thing I think is pretty clear is that the MM is responsible for the entire deal and thus also for the refund. So if there went something wrong it's the fault of the MM.

So going by my post, if JokerArt feels the same way he should most likely make that very clear in the rules (not sure if it is or not) and Teken should be banned until the money is paid back. Again, literally a non-issue.

[TheBigDream]

I do understand your point, all im saying is, the address belongs to OP and does not look like a disposable one. So in the end he received the money

 

If the address still belong to the OP then this isn't classed as a scam since it's still his wallet / address meaning he still received the refund from the abandoned deal.

 

This scam report is all kinds of fucked up.

 

I recon a member of staff should be on teamviewer with OP going through his wallets to clarify some of this information.

 

Maybe he made a dupe account to do this "deal" to rope Teken into it. 

Then sent to addresses on purpose, since I'm guessing he didn't clarify the first address wasn't his and now has the money and claiming he didn't receive it.

 

Yes undoubted Teken should have double checked but OP still received the money being both are his wallet. 

 

Kinda sketchy if you ask me.

[bleach]

I do understand your point, all im saying is, the address belongs to OP and does not look like a disposable one. So in the end he received the money

I get your point. I do see, that the address has many other transactions, and like you say, it probably isn't a temporary one.

The problem however is, that we don't have any sufficient proof, that OP received the money/hasn't received the money.

 

I don't have any big knowledge of cryptocurrencies either, so I'm not sure what's right. Does Lucas maybe have anything?

 

 

On the other hand, it's kinda sketchy from OPs side.

[JellyFish]

From what I've read, Teken is not at fault one bit. The OP should reimburse the loss out of his personal funds rather than Teken. How ridiculous to even decide in the OPs favour let alone ban teken.

I guess it's better if you add arguments on why you think he shouldn't be banned.