Scam report against Teken 0.03087 BTC | UID = 45124 | %Amount%

[Jokerart]

Why are you even asking what does community have to say about this? Sounds like you know more than it has been said and now you're looking for us to comment and defend Teken so you can close a scam report in his favor.

 

On topic, what was the time difference between OP sending first and second address? Is it possible that his address changed and despite Teken sending BTC to first address, OP didn't receive the money?

 

I'm taking the community's opinion as i do not think it is a scam while another staff member does, so i'm looking for more opinions.

[pRince0000]

Looking at the first address, it has 174 tx done on it and 1,000 usd on it which means that it is not a disposable address nor one which belongs to 1 time product/service.

What was the time difference first and second address has been sent? For example, first address has been sent at 7pm and second address has been sent at 7:07pm same day.

[Solidity]

Looking at the first address, it has 174 tx done on it and 1,000 usd on it which means that it is not a disposable address nor one which belongs to 1 time product/service.

 

So for you  thrinityx received the money but on the first address ?

If yes, we need proof of  thrinityx ,  if it is the owner of this address.

[Srau]

More info needs to be provided on the PMs before a decision is made.

[Lucas]

Looking at the first address, it has 174 tx done on it and 1,000 usd on it which means that it is not a disposable address nor one which belongs to 1 time product/service.

It could be a disposable address, he could have sent the wrong address to the middleman and then changed his mind, he could have given the wrong exchange address to the middleman and then changed his mind, we are not discussing if the address belongs to him but if the user is still in possession of it, and if he sent a new one, and it was still sent to the first one, we have to assume it's not. I don't mean to disrespect any decision but if a middleman is provided with an address he has to send it to that address specified later on, not the first one. Knowing when the first and second address were sent in messages and when the transaction was sent could confirm this, if the time frame was too short it's not on teken, but if hours passed between each message, then teken should have sent it to the latter address, not the first provided. 

[pRince0000]

It could be a disposable address, he could have sent the wrong address to the middleman and then changed his mind, he could have given the wrong exchange address to the middleman and then changed his mind, we are not discussing if the address belongs to him but if the user is still in possession of it, and if he sent a new one, and it was still sent to the first one, we have to assume it's not. I don't mean to disrespect any decision but if a middleman is provided with an address he has to send it to that address specified later on, not the first one. Knowing when the first and second address were sent in messages and when the transaction was sent could confirm this, if the time frame was too short it's not on teken, but if hours passed between each message, then teken should have sent it to the latter address, not the first provided. 

Exactly my point. Give us the time difference between first and second address being sent.

[Relent]

If OP provided 2 addresses and Teken sent him the money on one of his addresses, then I can`t see how this is a scam. It`s more like a miscommunication between both parts which also sucks for both parts

[ContjeJr]

Looking at the first address, it has 174 tx done on it and 1,000 usd on it which means that it is not a disposable address nor one which belongs to 1 time product/service.

I agree 1000%

I did my words already, i think OP is playing. Or this was just an stupid accedent.

As i see the money i sent to an address from the OP then Teken does not hold any money from the OP.

[notworthy]

But then if the guy that got "scammed" recieved the money then why would he hastefully want to get teken banned? All that effort for the ban of teken?

[Soidus]

But then if the guy that got "scammed" recieved the money then why would he hastefully want to get teken banned? All that effort for the ban of teken?

He wants to double his money