Or maybe like not being able to get rep/likes w/o 2FA? :thinking:
No I personally think that an Award would be nice or simply force every one to use 2FA
For the guys who dont use 2FA, at least they can recover there account easily.
And my question is whats wrong if nulled add those features, like its for those who dont want to use 2FA...its like a little more security from nulled to its users not using 2FA.
+1
As I said, I already suggested these features and I was told they were pointless. You need to understand your account's security is your responsibility and if you decide not to set 2fa and you get hacked it's your responsibility and not ours. 2FA would secure your account fully, not allowing any hacker to access your account, if you choose not to use it and you get hacked it's completely and 100% on you. You have the chance to use the most secure feature and you decide not to.
MY ONLY BITCOIN ADDRESS IS IN MY PROFILE. IF I SEND A DIFFERENT ONE IT'S NOT ME.
I HAVE 2 DISCORD PROFILES:
"@lucas.1337" DISCORD ID IS "474341590891102219"
"@n.to" DISCORD ID IS "1056693864322318406"
MY TELEGRAM: t.me/LucasNulledTo
https://www.nulled.t...ypto-addresses/
^MY ONLY CRYPTO ADDRESSES^
ALWAYS ASK FOR A PM, NEVER SEND ME MONEY WITHOUT RECEIVING A MESSAGE FROM ME ON NULLED. I WILL NEVER REFUSE TO PM YOU.
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING SCAMMED:
https://www.nulled.to/topic/543296-beware-new-impersonation-scam-must-read/
No I personally think that an Award would be nice or simply force every one to use 2FA
Either force everyone or prevent them from getting likes/rep would be HQ indeed.
Please stop adding my discord for nothing/fitbit services.
As I said, I already suggested these features and I was told they were pointless. You need to understand your account's security is your responsibility and if you decide not to set 2fa and you get hacked it's your responsibility and not ours. 2FA would secure your account fully, not allowing any hacker to access your account, if you choose not to use it and you get hacked it's completely and 100% on you. You have the chance to use the most secure feature and you decide not to.
I dont know why you dont understand me.
I completely agree with you but who dont like security?
you said user have chance to use more secure feature or? or don't use the feature with 0% security?
I mean there is no middle way or like giving 50% security without 2FA?
dont know why your suggestion was rejected previously, this is definitely A MUSH HAVE think for any forum.
Hope this time JokerArt and finndev gets agree on my suggestion.
Users browsing this thread: