ALERT!
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!

Jump to content

Coefficient's Content

There have been 18 items by Coefficient (Search limited from Jun 19, 2023)


By content type

See this member's


Sort by                Order  

#6511975 Scam report against Coefficient | /user/566323-coefficient | 1 License (worth...

Posted by Coefficient on 02 April 2017 - 08:46 PM in Solved

This is my last post by this account. I didn't exit scammed, I'm just bored of dealing with stupid guys.

 

Ban my account admin.

https://www.nulled.t...a-595139-£235/

 

Yup, exit scam. Retard




#6511827 Scam report against Coefficient | /user/566323-coefficient | 1 License (worth...

Posted by Coefficient on 02 April 2017 - 08:32 PM in Solved

Well it looks like this kid exit scammed...

 

kZJfFM.png




#6494550 Scam report against Coefficient | /user/566323-coefficient | 1 License (worth...

Posted by Coefficient on 31 March 2017 - 11:26 PM in Solved

Spoiler

 

The cherry on top; this guy keeps threatening/blackmailing me that he'll release my so called dox. This clearly demonstrates his childish attitude and lack of business acumen.




#6478894 Scam report against Coefficient | /user/566323-coefficient | 1 License (worth...

Posted by Coefficient on 30 March 2017 - 01:45 AM in Solved

I've been exceedingly nice to this kid yet he tries, again and again, to extort more off of me. I've paid him way more than I should of with the initial deal (~1.5k) yet he keeps bothering me and making up dumb shit.
 
First off, I want to state that this kid sent me an infected file that cost me roughly around 2.9k in damages, I was nice by accepting his lame excuse and letting him back on board.
 
Now I want him to get the fuck off the project because he's a retarded scumbag that pisses me off as well as customers. So being a reasonable businessman, I offered him severance pay for his leave, he declined my first offer but since I couldn't stand him anymore I offered more.
 
Now like the greedy little bitch he is, he forces me to send his 500$ even if he himself stated there was no time limit on the deal.
 
Spoiler

 
I'm done being kind to this scumbag; he got what he deserves.
 
Also, he took the liberty of 'taking' my customer skype group, even though it was clearly stated as Ignite's group (he hasn't even changed the Ignite logo). His only reason for taking the group is that 'he created it,' the thing is he doesn't that understand that creator != owner.
 
Spoiler



#6458631 Scam report against Coefficient | /user/566323-coefficient | 1 License (worth...

Posted by Coefficient on 27 March 2017 - 04:55 PM in Solved

I am aware of the situation, I will post my reply and expose his idiocy once I get back home.



#5722428 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 07 January 2017 - 06:28 AM in Solved

The software has never fully worked for him and now when he opened the scam report you fix the issue? lol

In my opinion he should receive a full refund since you never really took his issue seriously

 

No, the software was working fine for the majority of users, he reported the bug I and I told him that I would fix it by tomorrow (which is today) and once I woke up and fixed the issue, I see he opened this scam report.

 

I don't see how this is a report. The software is working properly yet he refuses to use it.

 

At this point, I just believe it's his huge ego that's keeping this thread alive, he refuses to discuss with us yet he still doesn't want to consider the facts.




#5722049 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 07 January 2017 - 04:49 AM in Solved

I haven't received the new version, i don't know if its autoupdate or not, but i honestly don't care.

And yes of course its very easy to PM other people with the 'working' version and then tell them to make a video.

I am completely done with these 2 guys, they even called me retarded wich is ridiculous for people that are actually supposed to help in this situation

 

Yes, you have ivar, it's auto updated. All you have to do is open the software once again and you'll be greeted with the new version.

 

We PM trusted members of the community to prove that the software functions correctly since you refuse to use the tool yourself and keep lying that it isn't working.

 

We called you a retard because you start to get bigger then you are by saying my code is 'shit' when you have no idea what you're looking at. You were clueless to what you were doing whilst being rude about it, hence us being rude too.

 

It's time for you to put your ego aside, grow the fuck up and stop acting like a child. Everything is working fine and you're just causing more drama.




#5720433 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 07 January 2017 - 12:11 AM in Solved

ayy lmao devs are arguing with a user that the tool is working, instead of trying to help the user fix the problem xDD

 

Actually, we did fix the problem. We are just demonstrating that our tool works fine now, yet, he refuses to discuss.




#5720363 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 07 January 2017 - 12:02 AM in Solved

Jbhstf.png

 

udMexq.png

 

Everything is working fine :)




#5719990 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 06 January 2017 - 11:06 PM in Solved

So Ivarovich must provide proof he didn't know this would happen, and you must provide proof you told him that it was a beta and he was part of the error checking team. 

 

Normally, when you are uncertain your tool works properly, you let a few beta testers use it while you check for errors, and then release it to public after everything was tested. Why didn't you do that? 

 

They are currently only 10 customers, all are beta testers and agreed to help us fix bugs.




#5719959 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 06 January 2017 - 11:02 PM in Solved

Are you gonna waste your time arguing now or you are going to start coding instead?

 

Actually, I've been coding for 4 hours now. Thanks for letting me know :)

 

EDIT: To everyone. You can all complain based on what Ivar said but nonetheless, we have the only checker that is proxyless and we didn't pull and iDev and scam everyone once our product got some criticism.




#5719937 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 06 January 2017 - 11:00 PM in Solved

I highly doubt they are judging your code, I think they are judging the fact that as it was released early it's not working as everyone would expect so they want a refund. Even if it's a beta. It's up to you when you stop calling it a beta. You could keep it a beta forever and keep saying errors are normal, forever.

Everyone that bought the product has been thoroughly explained the terms and services, they all confirmed they were okay with helping me fix the bugs and that they did, in fact, know it was a beta and that errors WOULD occur.




#5719916 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 06 January 2017 - 10:56 PM in Solved

So what you are saying is that it is now fixed?

Yes, the checker is fully working since this morning.




#5719895 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 06 January 2017 - 10:53 PM in Solved

He obviously said that as a metaphor. It's obvious you didn't write the code 3 lines at a time. Don't focus on a sentence when there's a whole thread pointing at you and nodecode. :/

I completely understand that it's a metaphor, I just don't enjoy when clueless people think they can judge my code.




#5719878 Scam report against | NodeCode | 595139 | 200$

Posted by Coefficient on 06 January 2017 - 10:52 PM in Solved

metaphor noun [ C or U ] UK ​ /ˈmet.ə.fɔːr/ US ​ /ˈmet̬.ə.fɔːr/ ​ C2 an expression, often found in literature, that describes a person or object by referring to something that is considered to have similar characteristics to that person or object:

 

Basically he compared you to a guy who writes 3 lines of code a hour just to call you a shit coder, but doubt you could understand that if you cant make your own checker work.

Shit coder? I'd like to see you try and code a hello world. My checker is fully working, no need to ignore the facts.